The Author – Bart Busschots
Creative Commons
Unless otherwise stated, the content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution, Noncommercial, No Derivative Works 3.0 License
Jan
9
.Mac – The Devil is in the Implementation
Filed Under Computers & Tech on January 9, 2007 at 3:34 am
Apple really go out of their way to push .Mac so a little over three months ago I decided to give their 90 day free trial a go. I may as well see for myself what all the hype is about right! On paper .Mac is great. The iDisk is a wonderful idea, the idea of syncing your application settings, calendar, contacts email …… is wonderful. However, I’m sure we’ve all heard the phrase the devil is in the detail, well, with .Mac it’s similar, the devil is in the implementation.
[tags]Apple, .Mac[/tags]
The Good
At this stage I have quite a few apps that can sync their settings via .Mac and I have a lot of passwords that it would be nice to have synchronized. I enabled synchronization and it worked. It was a handy feature and because the syncing all happens in the background I didn’t notice a performance hit, so, to be fair, syncing to .Mac seems to work, at least when the .Mac servers are up!
I’m trying to find another good thing to say about .Mac but all I can say is that the idea has great potential. But, as every school kid knows, that’s not a good thing to see on your report card, that’s a really bad thing to see!
The Very Very Bad
The single biggest problem with .Mac is performance. The .Mac servers are so insanely slow that the iDisk is un-usable for all but the smallest of files. Using it to backup any amount of data is not an option. But it gets MUCH worse. Once you mount your iDisk EVERY file dialog on your computer slows down because each time you go to open a file or save a file or view a file or what ever OS X goes and contacts your iDisk because it’s in the sidebar of the finder. The effect it had on my MacMini was astounding. It was as if someone had snuck in over-night and swapped my G4 processor for a G3! It actually made my Mac frustrating to use! But it gets worse, not only are the servers slow, they are also un-reliable and when they go down you have no way of contacting Apple. Your hundred dollars don’t get you proper support and Apple seem to be very slow to fix .Mac problems. It’s as if they just don’t care!
However, none of this really matters because there is an even more fundamental problem, you have FAR too little space. If you were to do even the half of all the great things Apple say you can do with your .Mac account you’ll go sailing past your paltry 1GB limit in no time atall. Who could possibly back up their music, photos & documents, store their email, and publish their podcasts and web pages on 1GB of disk space!?
The final nail in the coffin of .Mac is the price Apple expect you to pay for this shambles of a service. Just under a hundred dollars a year it costs you to buy 1GB of frustration and pain. No matter what way you look at it it’s terrible value for money. What really annoys me is that all this is just based on WebDAV technology but Apple won’t let you use any other WebDAV server from within the iSync tool. The technology is all right there in the OS but they are blocking us from using it with servers that actually work. Bad show Apple, bad show 🙁
Needless to say I didn’t continue with .Mac after my free trial and I doubt I ever will again unless Apple make some massive changes to the implementation, the quotas and the price.
Hosting and using your own WebDAV server instead of .Mac would make such a feature actually useful. It’s nice that some aspects of the OS work like that, such as iCal calender publishing, and disc mounting. It’s unfortunate that iSync doesn’t.
Indeed Alan,
I installed WebDAV on my personal web server and now have my personal equivalent of an iDisk and calendar sharing. But there are two features of .Mac that I really resent being deprived of, the off-line copy of my iDisk that automatically syncs with the web when it gets the chance, and of course the ability to sync settings and data with iSync.
Wouldn’t it be great if Leopard let us do all that!
Bart.
[…] One other point to note is that I think Steve gave us a hint as to at least one thing we’ll see at the WWDC, the next generation of .Mac. I sure hope I picked up that hint right because .Mac is well over-due a major over-haul (see .Mac – The Devil is in the Implementation). […]
[…] other bug-bear with OS X at the moment is the terribly shoddy state of .Mac. I’ve laid out my gripes in detail before so I’m not going into them again here. Bottom line, .Mac sucks. I’m actually prepared to […]
[…] some new features but that’s just building even more on top of a broken foundation. None of the fundamental problems with .Mac were addressed. We did get a new look for Leopard but I’m not sure it’s really all that special. […]
[…] was always the implementation. I expressed my views on .Mac back in January 2007 in a post entitled “.Mac – The Devil is in the Implementation”, and nothing has really changed since. I had high hopes that Mobile Me would finally give us the […]